|
Comments about this poem ("Unto Me?" I do not know you
by
Emily Dickinson
) |
|
Click here to write your
comments about this poem ("Unto Me?" I do not know you by
Emily Dickinson
)
 |
Adam Sobh
(4/10/2009 11:52:00 AM) |
I'm doing a project on Emily Dickinson for my 11th grade American Literature class, and i need to find a poem by Miss Emily Dickinson and then analyze it, i chose this poem, but i don't really understand it, so if anybody could please explain it to me and help me to better understand it, i would be extremely grateful.
|
|
|
|
Paul Schwiesow
(4/13/2008 1:39:00 AM) |
Naveed -
I have a different interpretation of the line you quote. I think Dickinson writes the poem as a dialogue between the speaker (herself) and Jesus. I don't think she's telling Jesus to trust to omnipotence—instead, Jesus telling HER (the speaker) to trust to omnipotence, in the imagined dialogue. I say this because, well, that's what Dickinson does, but also because the line:
'Arms of Mine—sufficient Phaeton—
Trust Omnipotence'—
Is enclosed within quotation marks. The poem appears to follow a consistent pattern in that the lines of the speaker are written without quotes, while the lines attributed to Jesus—or imagined as coming from Jesus—appear within quotation marks.
So a literal translation of the poem might read something like this:
(Emily says) :
Jesus, you say things like “Come unto me” (as in, “Suffer the little children to come unto me”) in my translation of the Bible. But I ask myself, “what do you mean, Jesus, by saying ‘come unto me? ’ I don’t know who you are. I mean to say, I don’t know you personally. I haven’t spoken to you directly. I can’t say you’ve ‘spoken’ to me, except through the Bible.
So (says Emily to herself) , OK— I’ll look at the Bible, and see what Jesus seems to be saying. Aha—the Bible tells me that Jesus might say something like this to me: “I am Jesus, who used to live in Judea and now lives in Paradise.”
So (says Emily) : Right, then. I’ll talk to this Jesus guy in the Bible by imagining I’m having a conversation with him. The first thing I’d ask is, “do you have wagons, Jesus, to carry me to where you are? ‘Cause where I am on earth is a long way from paradise.”
So (says Emily) let’s imagine what Jesus would say. I, Emily Dickinson, bet, based on my knowledge of what Jesus is like that I have from my Bible reading, that Jesus would tell me something like “Consider the arms that I have, Emily—that should be a sufficient Phaeton for you (‘phaeton’ being a four-wheeled horse-drawn carriage—i.e., the ‘wagon’ that you, Emily, are looking for) . Trust me—I am, after all, Jesus, so I am God, and am omnipotent. Trust to that. I’ve got you covered.”
To which Emily replies, “Oh, but Jesus, I’m spotted (tainted by original sin) , so I can’t possibly merit a ride to Paradise in your Phaeton.”
To which Jesus responds “No sweat, babe—I pardon your sins.”
To which Emily rejoins “but I’m just a little, insignificant person.”
To which Jesus responds (again, in Dickinson’s imagination, based on her Biblical knowledge, particularly of the Sermon on the Mount and the Beatitudes) : “The last shall be first in my House (i.e., Paradise) , my dear. Read your Bible, honey.”
Something like that.
This whole talking to yourself thing to try to stand in for God (or Jesus, or the Holy Spirit) talking to you, is pretty typical in religious poetry and in the writing of Christians in general (witness our current President) . One does it because one in fact doesn't hear anything from this imagined deity, and so must carry on an internal dialogue to persuade oneself of the valididty of faith. Dickinson, in my opinion, does it rather conventionally; I think Donne and, more importantly, Hopkins, do it better. They're still delusional, but they're at least more artistic about it. If I were hanging something on my wall, I'd go with Hopkins. He's the most genuine, and is also just a flat-out amazing poet. Try 'Spring and Fall.'
|
|
|
|
Naveed Akram
(3/31/2008 7:37:00 PM) |
This feels very good about Christianity, and Christians will react to it in very familiar patterns. It is good to see this poem being written for the advancement of Christian science, which is basically that pointed out by this poem. I do not take on every belief, but the passion is shown with a kind of fervour too polite. To tell Jesus that he trusts omnipotence is then brave and totally courageous. The bravery I can extract is vast in such a short amount of poetry. The poem is so small for its amount of information that it occupies my house!
|
|
|
|
Sean Buchsbaum
(11/6/2006 1:09:00 AM) |
have u no respect for her poetry there is more in it then is written you have to just read extra carefully
|
|
|
|
celine charcoal
(11/24/2004 7:16:00 PM) |
sorry emily.. i stop here.. ur poems r boring..
|
|
Read all
5
comments >>
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
People who read
Emily Dickinson
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
