Poetics and Poetry Discussion

Post a message
  • Rookie - 7 Points Max Reif (10/16/2005 4:51:00 PM) Post reply | Read 8 replies
    0 person liked.
    0 person did not like.

    Here's some meat to chew on, maybe, rather than fight over:
    how'd you become poets? Some people tell that story on their bio, others don't have one.
    (I'll reply to this and answer for myself)

    Replies for this message:

    To read all of 8 replies click here
  • Rookie - 7 Points Max Reif (10/16/2005 12:12:00 PM) Post reply | Read 1 reply

    'I went to a boxing match and a hockey game broke out.'-Rodney Dangerfield
    Van Dyck, didn't he also invent the beard?
    But seriously, folks...
    (continued next post. I've jested myself into a corner here.)

    Replies for this message:
    • Rookie - 7 Points Michael Shepherd (10/16/2005 2:57:00 PM) Post reply | Read 1 reply

      No it was the other way around - I went to a poetry site and a boxing match broke out... Van Dyke invented Hollywood Cockney, and Vandyke Brown that you used at art school, called that for unmentiona ... more

  • Rookie Ikazoboh Austine Jeffrey (10/16/2005 10:10:00 AM) Post reply | Read 2 replies

    If there were no figures of speech, iwoudnt have been writing poetry.What do you think?

    Replies for this message:
    • Rookie Max Reif (10/16/2005 12:32:00 PM) Post reply

      go figure! (that's my 2-word Poet's Manifesto)

    • Rookie Michael Shepherd (10/16/2005 11:29:00 AM) Post reply

      I'd say, perceptive, and correct - but try to define a 'figure of speech / trope / schema', and you're into pages of the encyclopaedia of poetics, and take your machete...

  • Rookie John Kay (10/16/2005 8:38:00 AM) Post reply | Read 1 reply


    I wouldn't expect that you would agree with me. You just seem rather angry and out for a fight. You want to defend the scratches and the right for shoddy workmanship. Is that what you're saying. What exactly are you fighting for. What is your point?

    On the personal side, thank God for people like you. The next time I get in a fist fight behind a bar, I hope we're on the same side.


    Replies for this message:
    • Rookie Herbert Nehrlich1 (10/16/2005 4:57:00 PM) Post reply

      John, it is rather amusing that you say I am angry and looking for a fight. I am not. Not agreeing with you doesn't agree with you, so you need to attack the messenger? I am well aware of the diff ... more

  • Rookie John Kay (10/16/2005 7:18:00 AM) Post reply | Read 2 replies

    Herbert: I like the website myself, or I wouldn't spend so much time here, and I know that there are many dabblers, but there are also many poets who take this seriously-as I expect you do. You're not a dabbler are you? The question of responsibility and standards can be better seen by looking at another medium-photography. If you looked at a photograph with scratches all over the surface, would you immediately jump up and say they were unacceptable, no how good the photograph was? We all would-even if we aren't photographers. It's simple. The minimum standard for a photograph is 'no scratches.' The same applies to poetry. No cliches. And the Van Dyke poem is nothing but cliches, line by line. It was hard for me to read, frankly. Herbert, are you agruing for cliches? For scratchs. Is the photograph beautiful if someone is blind to the scratches? I have been trained to see the scratches and go into the darkroom with other photographers and help them produce negatives and prints that don't have scratches, that don't have cliches. That's what we learned in school; but even more dramatically, during my time writing poems and working with thousands of my own students, I have learned this lesson over and over again from Frost, Stevens, Whitman, Neruda, etc., that there are standards, and that their poems are the expression of those standards. After you read Van Dyke, do yourself a service, go read a Frost poem. I am not here devoting my time to putting people down with 'harsh criticism' as you call it, Herbert, and why you would want to characterize me as childish, even though you are my senior, I believe, I don't know. None of us are great poets here. At best we are average, but I am working every day to become a 'good' poet, to write a poem that will offer you a new experience, not just another poem that you will have to swallow like a spoonful of mushy peas. If, when I die, they will say, 'He was a good poet, and he tried to share is experiences along the path with other poets, ' then I will be satisfied. I am a firm believer that the better we get at something the more we will experience the joy associated with the process or activity. Even the 'dabblers, ' who would probably be offened to be classified as such by you, might enjoy their writing experience more if they have standards. In an 'anything goes, ' 'everything is in they eye of the beholder, ' atmosphere, there is little motivation for improvement. Herbert, there is no art form that does not have minimum standards. That's simply not the way it is. I challenge you to look through my postings for any 'harsh criticism.' I am a teacher, and I only offer suggestions for improvement or praise; and having said that, I know that you all have something to teach me that you have learned along your poetic paths.

    Replies for this message:
    • Rookie Herbert Nehrlich1 (10/16/2005 7:48:00 AM) Post reply

      Thanks John, for taking the time to answer at length. However, I do not agree with you on most points. I am a dabbler. I dabble in skydiving, marathon running, off-road racing and poetry etc etc. I ... more

    To read all of 2 replies click here
  • Rookie - 200 Points Ernestine Northover (10/16/2005 5:29:00 AM) Post reply

    I do not count myself as a 'high calibre' writer of poems, I write because I enjoy composing, although, I am sure, it is not in the 'elitist band' I try to give people pleasure in reading poetry, albeit on the simple level. Reading the comments on poetry, I feel that whatever form a poem takes, it, I believe has to make sense to the reader, be a pleasure to read, either in an emotional way or in a humourous way. Some people may think a poem cleverly written, others think against this. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so to speak. I tend to keep mine simple, but with a story or fun theme which possibly lifts the heart. Whether rhyming or non-rhyming as long as it's understandable, we should enjoy writing them and not get too belligerant about it. Lets all be writers writing what we feel in our own way. OK, of course we are all striving to write 'the best poem ever' but, when the joy of writing goes then it becomes a stressful thing and you no longer achieve anything. There will always be someone on your wavelength. If people don't connect with my poems, thats alright with me. I'm not saying people can't discuss and comment, I have been given some very constructive comments, and have rsponded to them, and they have raised my poems to read much better, but I am not into pulling other peoples work to pieces. We all have different ways of writing and all I can say is that you are all really great, and deserve praise on all your individual styles. Variety is the spice of life, it would be a very dull world otherwise. Sincerely Ernestine Northover

  • Rookie Herbert Nehrlich1 (10/16/2005 5:17:00 AM) Post reply | Read 1 reply

    John Kay: 'Many of the poems posted on this website are poor imitations of the Van Dyke poem-too many. If making it new and fresh is not our responsibility...'.
    John, exactly what did you think this website is? A site for accomplished poets or a site for all to enjoy and dabble in poetry?
    As much as I gripe about poemhunter.com I must say without reservation of any kind that it is a veritable paradise for many.
    To be able to enjoy visiting here is something to be treasured and to be thankful for.
    Applying some arbitrary standards to the poems posted here and handing out harsh critique is missing the point and, to put put it bluntly, rather childish.

    No one denies that there are standards in poetry as there are in all of life's endeavours but it's a bit rich to play critic in such a misguided manner.

    Replies for this message:
    • Rookie Poetry Hound (10/16/2005 6:09:00 AM) Post reply

      Uh oh. Does this mean you're not going to be handing out harsh critiques anymore? I think I'll miss that.

  • Rookie John Kay (10/16/2005 4:30:00 AM) Post reply | Read 1 reply

    Again, I'm with Jefferson on this topic. You wouldn't know that we studied at the same school with many of the same teachers, fine poets in their own right, at the same time, about thirty years ago. For me, as a serious poet, it is my responsibility to make every poem I write NEW, unlike anyone any other poem written, and that is a tall order. It should bring forth something from the language that is rich and mysterious, maybe something spell-binding that has never been seen or heard before in quite the same way. It should be uncluttered without cliches and worn-out poetic strategies. For that I am responsible. Many of the poems posted on this website are poor imitations of the Van Dyke poem-too many. If making it new and fresh is not our responsibility to the language, then what is our responsibility? We can argue intellectually all day about taste and the democracy of opinions, but what we do when we begin to shape a poem is another matter. We can write a Van Dyke like poem-god forbid-or we can make something new. When you leave one of my poems, I would hope that you are thinking, if nothing else, I have never read anything like that before and it sprang from a place of honest feeling, not sentimentality. I ask you, really, what do you think Frost would think of the Van Dyke poem? I have not doubt.

    Replies for this message:
    • Rookie Poetry Hound (10/16/2005 6:05:00 AM) Post reply | Read 2 replies

      With this clarity of mind, it's no wonder you are one of the best poets on this site, John. It's not a question of there being standards; it's a question of whether a poem is NEW. I like that you alw ... more

  • Veteran Poet - 1,106 Points Jerry Hughes (10/16/2005 3:50:00 AM) Post reply


  • Rookie - 7 Points Max Reif (10/15/2005 10:10:00 PM) Post reply | Read 3 replies

    We had all this nicely resolved about 8 hours ago, as a matter of taste.
    I don't want to die for this poem, but there are many celebrated poets from whom I get NOTHING, and I did get something from this one. I've actually *read* Fussell's 'Poetic Form and Poetic Meter', and I've read a fair amount, I don't know if any amount of reading would make me the same as anyone else.

    I'm getting tired of the discussion. I guess I'm trying to have the last word. Rather doubtful that this will be it.

    Replies for this message:
    • Rookie - 7 Points Poetry Hound (10/15/2005 10:20:00 PM) Post reply

      Of COURSE it's a matter of taste. But that's not all it is. It's also a matter of recognizing what's been done a million times before. If you nevertheless like something that is derivative or cliche, ... more

    • Rookie - 7 Points Herbert Nehrlich1 (10/15/2005 10:16:00 PM) Post reply

      No Max, you will NOT have the last word, lest we call you mad Max. But you are exactly right (sometimes I sense the voice of reason in you) it does come down to taste. You may drive a Chevy Caprice a ... more

    • Rookie - 7 Points Poetry Hound (10/15/2005 10:15:00 PM) Post reply | Read 3 replies

      Well, sorry for not having been around 8 hours ago, Max. But I find the discussion interesting. Why do you want it to end?

Comment of the Day

  • Why is the link to the forum missing from the top-page orange bar???
    Is it just me, or is this circumstance ascribed to all?
    . .

PoemHunter.com Updates

[Hata Bildir]